Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews Odds: 79% of Bets on Underdog Matthews at UFC 275

Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews Odds: 79% of Bets on Underdog Matthews at UFC 275
UFC 275 is headlined by Glover Teixeira vs. Jiří Prochaska but there's a fight on the undercard that you should keep an eye on. Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews should be an entertaining fight and one that you might want to put some action on.
Andre Fialho already has three fights under his belt while Jake Matthews is well rested, as he hasn't gotten in the octagon since March of 2021. Let's dive into the Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews odds.
Looking for the best sportsbook offers? Check out the free bets page
Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews Odds
Name | Odds | Implied Chance |
---|---|---|
Andre Fialho | -130 | 56.52% |
Jake Matthews | +118 | 45.87% |
Click here for Fialho vs. Matthews odds
Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews Odds Breakdown
According to the Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews odds, the oddsmakers are giving Andre Fialho a 56.52% chance of beating Jake Matthews tonight when they get in the octagon. Jake Matthews is a slight underdog, given a 45.87% chance of pulling off the upset.
The Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews odds clearly lean slightly towards Andre Fialho but does the public agree? No, not really.
Bet $5, Get $200 Guaranteed when betting on UFC 275 with FanDuel
Andre Fialho, while a favorite, is seeing just 21% of the bets and 19% of the handle which means we're seeing 79% of the bets and 81% of the handle on Jake Matthews at UFC 275.
Fialho, since joining the UFC in 2022 has three fights under his belt already. He lost to Michel Pereira and then pulled off back-to-back wins before this upcoming fight tonight. For Jake Matthews, he is coming off a loss to Sean Brady which came in March of 2021. He hasn't been in the ring in a long time, and is obviously the more rested fighter.
Will we see rust or will that rest prove to be beneficial? We'll have to wait and see but it looks like the Andre Fialho vs. Jake Matthews odds and the betting public disagree here on this one.